linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: nVMX: Fixes for nested state migration when eVMCS is in use

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b7539613-2a25-bcdb-cfe2-c57c6c0da39f@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 16:17:07 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] KVM: nVMX: Fixes for nested state migration when
 eVMCS is in use

On 27/05/21 16:11, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
>> Using 'nested_run_pending=1' perhaps? Or, we can get back to 'vm_bugged'
>> idea and kill the guest immediately if something forces such an exit.
> Exactly, this is my idea. Set the nested_run_pending=1 always after the migration
> It shoudn't cause any issues and it would avoid cases like that.
> 
> That variable can then be renamed too to something like 'nested_vmexit_not_allowed'
> or something like that.
> 
> Paolo, what do you think?

(If it works :)) that's clever.  It can even be set unconditionally on 
the save side and would even work for new->old migration.

Paolo