[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210527145441.GE30378@techsingularity.net>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:54:41 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Hritik Vijay <hritikxx8@...il.com>,
Linux-BPF <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Net <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc: Work around a pahole limitation with
zero-sized struct pagesets
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 07:37:05AM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > This patch checks for older versions of pahole and only allows
> > DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES if pahole supports zero-sized per-cpu structures.
> > DEBUG_INFO_BTF is still allowed as a KVM boot test passed with pahole
>
> Unfortunately this won't work. The problem is that vmlinux BTF is
> corrupted, which results in module BTFs to be rejected as well, as
> they depend on it.
>
> But vmlinux BTF corruption makes BPF subsystem completely unusable. So
> even though kernel boots, nothing BPF-related works. So we'd need to
> add dependency for DEBUG_INFO_BTF on pahole 1.22+.
>
While bpf usage would be broken, the kernel will boot and the effect
should be transparent to any kernel build based on "make oldconfig".
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF defaults N so if that is forced out, it will be
easily missed by a distribution kernel maintainer.
Yes, users of BPF will be affected and it may generate bug reports but
the fix will be to build with a working pahole. Breaking boot on the other
hand is a lot more visible and hacking around this with a non-zero struct
size has been shot down.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists