[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdbPvxN2-VTm+n-j6JiWZnraCviZ2JDFe=A7Z=z93-seVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 17:05:32 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, jamipkettunen@...ainline.org,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: qcom: sm6125: Document
SM6125 pinctrl driver
Hi Martin,
overall this looks good but the bot warned because of this:
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 9:30 PM Martin Botka
<martin.botka@...ainline.org> wrote:
>
> Document the newly added SM6125 pinctrl driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>
(...)
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: qcom,sm6125-tlmm
(...)
> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> + pinctrl@...000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,sm6125-pinctrl";
So it seems like you didn't run the checks?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists