[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210527024926.oqfxngkm4phgrim4@riteshh-domain>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 08:19:26 +0530
From: riteshh <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
To: chenyichong <chenyichong@...ontech.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use local variables ei instead of invoking function
EXT4_I
On 21/05/26 01:29PM, chenyichong wrote:
Thanks for the patch. Looks good to me.
Feel free to add
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: chenyichong <chenyichong@...ontech.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index fe6045a46599..a5c4cd1c757b 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ void ext4_da_update_reserve_space(struct inode *inode,
> ei->i_reserved_data_blocks -= used;
> percpu_counter_sub(&sbi->s_dirtyclusters_counter, used);
>
> - spin_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&ei->i_block_reservation_lock);
>
> /* Update quota subsystem for data blocks */
> if (quota_claim)
> --
> 2.20.1
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists