lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <636067f3ed65429ab1094b851aae5256@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 15:11:41 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>
CC:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC v2-fix-v2 1/1] x86/traps: Add #VE support for TDX guest

+struct ve_info {
+	u64 exit_reason;
+	u64 exit_qual;
+	u64 gla;
+	u64 gpa;
+	u32 instr_len;
+	u32 instr_info;
+};

I guess that "gla" = Guest Linear Address ... which is a very "Intel" way of
describing what everyone else would call a Guest Virtual Address.

I don't feel strongly about this though. If this has already been hashed
out already then stick with this name.

Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>

-Tony

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ