[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <636067f3ed65429ab1094b851aae5256@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 15:11:41 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC v2-fix-v2 1/1] x86/traps: Add #VE support for TDX guest
+struct ve_info {
+ u64 exit_reason;
+ u64 exit_qual;
+ u64 gla;
+ u64 gpa;
+ u32 instr_len;
+ u32 instr_info;
+};
I guess that "gla" = Guest Linear Address ... which is a very "Intel" way of
describing what everyone else would call a Guest Virtual Address.
I don't feel strongly about this though. If this has already been hashed
out already then stick with this name.
Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists