linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.12 1/7] bpf: Wrap aux data inside bpf_sanitize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210527151139.296120517@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 17:13:02 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.12 1/7] bpf: Wrap aux data inside bpf_sanitize_info container

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

commit 3d0220f6861d713213b015b582e9f21e5b28d2e0 upstream.

Add a container structure struct bpf_sanitize_info which holds
the current aux info, and update call-sites to sanitize_ptr_alu()
to pass it in. This is needed for passing in additional state
later on.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@...il.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c |   18 +++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -5940,15 +5940,19 @@ static bool sanitize_needed(u8 opcode)
 	return opcode == BPF_ADD || opcode == BPF_SUB;
 }
 
+struct bpf_sanitize_info {
+	struct bpf_insn_aux_data aux;
+};
+
 static int sanitize_ptr_alu(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			    struct bpf_insn *insn,
 			    const struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg,
 			    const struct bpf_reg_state *off_reg,
 			    struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg,
-			    struct bpf_insn_aux_data *tmp_aux,
+			    struct bpf_sanitize_info *info,
 			    const bool commit_window)
 {
-	struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux = commit_window ? cur_aux(env) : tmp_aux;
+	struct bpf_insn_aux_data *aux = commit_window ? cur_aux(env) : &info->aux;
 	struct bpf_verifier_state *vstate = env->cur_state;
 	bool off_is_imm = tnum_is_const(off_reg->var_off);
 	bool off_is_neg = off_reg->smin_value < 0;
@@ -5977,8 +5981,8 @@ static int sanitize_ptr_alu(struct bpf_v
 		/* In commit phase we narrow the masking window based on
 		 * the observed pointer move after the simulated operation.
 		 */
-		alu_state = tmp_aux->alu_state;
-		alu_limit = abs(tmp_aux->alu_limit - alu_limit);
+		alu_state = info->aux.alu_state;
+		alu_limit = abs(info->aux.alu_limit - alu_limit);
 	} else {
 		alu_state  = off_is_neg ? BPF_ALU_NEG_VALUE : 0;
 		alu_state |= off_is_imm ? BPF_ALU_IMMEDIATE : 0;
@@ -6139,7 +6143,7 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struc
 	    smin_ptr = ptr_reg->smin_value, smax_ptr = ptr_reg->smax_value;
 	u64 umin_val = off_reg->umin_value, umax_val = off_reg->umax_value,
 	    umin_ptr = ptr_reg->umin_value, umax_ptr = ptr_reg->umax_value;
-	struct bpf_insn_aux_data tmp_aux = {};
+	struct bpf_sanitize_info info = {};
 	u8 opcode = BPF_OP(insn->code);
 	u32 dst = insn->dst_reg;
 	int ret;
@@ -6208,7 +6212,7 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struc
 
 	if (sanitize_needed(opcode)) {
 		ret = sanitize_ptr_alu(env, insn, ptr_reg, off_reg, dst_reg,
-				       &tmp_aux, false);
+				       &info, false);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return sanitize_err(env, insn, ret, off_reg, dst_reg);
 	}
@@ -6349,7 +6353,7 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struc
 		return -EACCES;
 	if (sanitize_needed(opcode)) {
 		ret = sanitize_ptr_alu(env, insn, dst_reg, off_reg, dst_reg,
-				       &tmp_aux, true);
+				       &info, true);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return sanitize_err(env, insn, ret, off_reg, dst_reg);
 	}