linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] More parallel operations for the TDP MMU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 15:26:41 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
        Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>,
        Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@...il.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] More parallel operations for the TDP MMU

On Thu, May 27, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 26/05/21 23:34, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > Applied to kvm/mmu-notifier-queue, thanks.
> > What's the plan for kvm/mmu-notifier-queue?  More specifically, are the hashes
> > stable, i.e. will non-critical review feedback get squashed?  I was finally
> > getting around to reviewing this, but what's sitting in that branch doesn't
> > appear to be exactly what's posted here.  If the hashes are stable, I'll probably
> > test and review functionality, but not do a thorough review.
> 
> It's all in 5.13 except for the lock elision patch, for which I was waiting
> for a review.  I'll post that patch separately.

Ha, stable indeed.  Thanks!