[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c6c6b686-6e13-2f1a-0310-b558428304c1@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 10:03:04 +0200
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers/firmware: consolidate EFI framebuffer setup
for all arches
Hello Thomas,
On 5/22/21 7:14 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
[snip]
>> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
>> @@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ config ARM
>> select PERF_USE_VMALLOC
>> select RTC_LIB
>> select SET_FS
>> + select SYSFB
>
> Don't select this as part of the architecture. Rather make an option for
> SYSFB that depends in the architectures that supports it.
>
Thanks a lot for the suggestion! I did this by making SYSFB's Kconfig option
to be default y and depends on the supported architectures as you mentioned.
This not only is a cleaner approach but also will allow to not touch all the
architectures platform code.
I'll wait for a few more days in case someone else has feedback and post a v2.
> Best regards
> Thomas
>
>
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Software Engineer
New Platform Technologies Enablement team
RHEL Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists