linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/thermal: Fix LVT thermal setup for SMI delivery mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87mtsf6zch.ffs@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 28 May 2021 10:23:42 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, James Feeney <james@...ealm.net>,
        linux-smp@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/thermal: Fix LVT thermal setup for SMI delivery mode

On Thu, May 27 2021 at 20:54, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 01:49:42PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Also if disabling this entry is causing the BIOS/SMM gunk to go south, then
>> disabling CONFIG_X86_THERMAL_VECTOR should have the same effect.
>
> Well, I believe the latter was practically impossible:
>
> config X86_THERMAL_VECTOR
> 	def_bool y
> 	depends on X86 && CPU_SUP_INTEL && X86_LOCAL_APIC

So you could disable CPU_SUP_INTEL ... Should still boot with reduced
functionality.

> so *if* the machine was sporting thermal SMI, then it very much needed
> that code in intel_init_thermal() to unstuck the cores. At least it
> looks that way...

What a mess...