[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOwMV_zin4ODuv8pA8_tfVyg3g9=Mrt2Txdk0O2wL8JqDefzog@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 11:11:24 +0200
From: Fabien Parent <fparent@...libre.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@...libre.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: mediatek: don't hardcode mode encoding in
common code
Hi Linus,
> Patch applied.
I just noticed an error in my patch:
@@ -135,7 +134,7 @@ static int mtk_pconf_set_ies_smt(struct
mtk_pinctrl *pctl, unsigned pin,
pin, pctl->devdata->port_align, value, arg);
}
- bit = BIT(pin & 0xf);
+ bit = BIT(offset & pctl->devdata->mode_mask);
I should not have replaced 'pin' by 'offset' here. What do you
recommend me to do here, shall I send a V2 of this series and you will
drop my V1 from your tree, or do you want me to make a new patch that
fixes the error created by this patch?
Thanks,
Fabien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists