[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YLC2k/5hqNNBnN6e@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 12:23:31 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/6] i2c: acpi: Export i2c_acpi_find_client_by_adev()
for users
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 10:26:33PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 03:43:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > There is at least one user that will gain from the
> > i2c_acpi_find_client_by_adev() being exported.
>
> No objections per se. But as the user is in staging, I want to ask if
> the use there is really a solution we would also accept outside of
> staging? Or is it a hack?
The similar OF API is exported for users, although amount of users and their
locations are different. The AtomISP driver is not in the best shape, I agree,
but for now any possible steps to make it better would be good steps in my
opinion. Later we may see if we can do this piece of code differently (IIRC
current way is probably the best taking into account legacy platforms support).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists