linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210528110644.79e015b3@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Fri, 28 May 2021 11:06:44 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:

  net/core/devlink.c

between commit:

  b28d8f0c25a9 ("devlink: Correct VIRTUAL port to not have phys_port attributes")

from the net tree and commit:

  f285f37cb1e6 ("devlink: append split port number to the port name")

from the net-next tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc net/core/devlink.c
index 051432ea4f69,69681f19388e..000000000000
--- a/net/core/devlink.c
+++ b/net/core/devlink.c
@@@ -8630,12 -8631,11 +8630,10 @@@ static int __devlink_port_phys_port_nam
  
  	switch (attrs->flavour) {
  	case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_PHYSICAL:
- 		if (!attrs->split)
- 			n = snprintf(name, len, "p%u", attrs->phys.port_number);
- 		else
- 			n = snprintf(name, len, "p%us%u",
- 				     attrs->phys.port_number,
- 				     attrs->phys.split_subport_number);
 -	case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_VIRTUAL:
+ 		n = snprintf(name, len, "p%u", attrs->phys.port_number);
+ 		if (n < len && attrs->split)
+ 			n += snprintf(name + n, len - n, "s%u",
+ 				      attrs->phys.split_subport_number);
  		break;
  	case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_CPU:
  	case DEVLINK_PORT_FLAVOUR_DSA:

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped