lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 28 May 2021 12:59:33 -0700
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
CC:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: dump_page: print total mapcount for compound page

On 5/28/21 12:03 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:26 AM John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 5/28/21 10:54 AM, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> The total mapcount is a useful information for debugging, but we can't
>>> call total_mapcount() directly since it calls some assertions which may
>>> be triggered as commit 6dc5ea16c86f ("mm,
>>> dump_page: do not crash with bad compound_mapcount()") met.
>>>
>>> We could implement yet another implementation for dump_page() but
>>> it has the limitation when individual mapcount of subpages is corrupted.
>>>
>>> Actually the total mapcount could be decoded from refcount, pincount and
>>> compound mapcount although it may be not very precise due to some
>>> transient references.
>>
>> If the mapcount calculation were in a separate routine, *and* if something
>> else in addition to dump_page() used it, then I'd be interested in
>> calling it from dump_page().
> 
> There is. The total_mapcount() is used by mm code. But as I mentioned
> in the commit log and that discussion email, it is not safe to call it
> directly in dump_page() path.
> 

Right! I apologize for missing the point that it is a separate function.

But unfortunately, the conclusion here is still the same, if you are
unable to actually call that function.

Basically, if you can make simple calls to retrieve and print out
information, then that's a good situation for diagnostics routines such
as dump_page(). But if you have to open-code calculations and those start
to get complex, then you have probably gone off in the wrong direction.

Keep in mind that the diag routines themselves have to be correct, and
they usually don't have the same level of testing that other routines
do.


thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ