[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210528221633.4d87dde5@oasis.local.home>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2021 22:16:33 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Kate Carcia <kcarcia@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>,
Clark Willaims <williams@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/9] hwlat improvements and osnoise/timerlat tracers
On Thu, 27 May 2021 14:07:37 +0200
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com> wrote:
> FWIW, I've been using the new tracers extensively downstream for a while
> now and I find them very useful and quite more precise to detect
> problems than what we currently have available.
>
> The fact that one can do almost everything needed to spot latency issues
> from entirely inside the kernel with a simple interface is a big plus to me
> as well.
>
> I wouldn't mind if this gets accepted very soon! :)
Neither would I ;-) But because of my extended vacation and other
immediate responsibilities I need to take care of, it may be a couple
of weeks before I can thoroughly look at this ;-)
Anyway, thanks for the vote of confidence.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists