| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 14:44:35 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>
Cc: mst@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] vdpa/mlx5: Add support for running with virtio_vdpa
在 2021/5/31 下午1:13, Eli Cohen 写道:
> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 11:16:11AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> 在 2021/5/30 下午3:54, Eli Cohen 写道:
>>> In order to support running vdpa using vritio_vdpa driver, we need to
>>> create a different kind of MR, one that has 1:1 mapping, since the
>>> addresses referring to virtqueues are dma addresses.
>>>
>>> We create the 1:1 MR in mlx5_vdpa_dev_add() only in case firmware
>>> supports the general capability umem_uid_0. The reason for that is that
>>> 1:1 MRs must be created with uid == 0 while virtqueue objects can be
>>> created with uid == 0 only when the firmware capability is on.
>>>
>>> If the set_map() callback is called with new translations provided
>>> through iotlb, the driver will destroy the 1:1 MR and create a regular
>>> one.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mlx5_vdpa.h | 1 +
>>> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>>> drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 13 ++++-
>>> 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mlx5_vdpa.h b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mlx5_vdpa.h
>>> index b6cc53ba980c..09a16a3d1b2a 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mlx5_vdpa.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mlx5_vdpa.h
>>> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ struct mlx5_vdpa_mr {
>>> /* serialize mkey creation and destruction */
>>> struct mutex mkey_mtx;
>>> + bool user_mr;
>>> };
>>> struct mlx5_vdpa_resources {
>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c
>>> index 800cfd1967ad..020c0ce4d203 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/core/mr.c
>>> @@ -360,7 +360,7 @@ static int add_direct_chain(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, u64 start, u64 size, u8
>>> * indirect memory key that provides access to the enitre address space given
>>> * by iotlb.
>>> */
>>> -static int _mlx5_vdpa_create_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb)
>>> +static int create_user_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb)
>>> {
>>> struct mlx5_vdpa_mr *mr = &mvdev->mr;
>>> struct mlx5_vdpa_direct_mr *dmr;
>>> @@ -374,9 +374,6 @@ static int _mlx5_vdpa_create_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, struct vhost_iotlb
>>> int err = 0;
>>> int nnuls;
>>> - if (mr->initialized)
>>> - return 0;
>>> -
>>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&mr->head);
>>> for (map = vhost_iotlb_itree_first(iotlb, start, last); map;
>>> map = vhost_iotlb_itree_next(map, start, last)) {
>>> @@ -414,7 +411,7 @@ static int _mlx5_vdpa_create_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, struct vhost_iotlb
>>> if (err)
>>> goto err_chain;
>>> - mr->initialized = true;
>>> + mr->user_mr = true;
>>> return 0;
>>> err_chain:
>>> @@ -426,33 +423,89 @@ static int _mlx5_vdpa_create_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, struct vhost_iotlb
>>> return err;
>>> }
>>> -int mlx5_vdpa_create_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb)
>>> +static int create_dma_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, struct mlx5_vdpa_mr *mr)
>>> +{
>>> + int inlen = MLX5_ST_SZ_BYTES(create_mkey_in);
>>> + void *mkc;
>>> + u32 *in;
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + in = kzalloc(inlen, GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!in)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + mkc = MLX5_ADDR_OF(create_mkey_in, in, memory_key_mkey_entry);
>>> +
>>> + MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, access_mode_1_0, MLX5_MKC_ACCESS_MODE_PA);
>>> + MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, length64, 1);
>>> + MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, lw, 1);
>>> + MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, lr, 1);
>>> + MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, pd, mvdev->res.pdn);
>>> + MLX5_SET(mkc, mkc, qpn, 0xffffff);
>>> +
>>> + err = mlx5_vdpa_create_mkey(mvdev, &mr->mkey, in, inlen);
>>> + kfree(in);
>>> + return err;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void destroy_dma_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, struct mlx5_vdpa_mr *mr)
>>> +{
>>> + mlx5_vdpa_destroy_mkey(mvdev, &mr->mkey);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int _mlx5_vdpa_create_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb)
>>> {
>>> struct mlx5_vdpa_mr *mr = &mvdev->mr;
>>> int err;
>>> - mutex_lock(&mr->mkey_mtx);
>>> + if (mr->initialized)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + if (iotlb)
>>> + err = create_user_mr(mvdev, iotlb);
>>> + else
>>> + err = create_dma_mr(mvdev, mr);
>>
>> Do we need to set user_mr to false here?
> I think the right place to do this should be inside create_dma_mr(), the
> same as we set it true in ().
Fine.
>>
>>> +
>>> + mr->initialized = true;
>>> + return err;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int mlx5_vdpa_create_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb)
>>> +{
>>> + int err;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&mvdev->mr.mkey_mtx);
>>> err = _mlx5_vdpa_create_mr(mvdev, iotlb);
>>> - mutex_unlock(&mr->mkey_mtx);
>>> + mutex_unlock(&mvdev->mr.mkey_mtx);
>>> return err;
>>> }
>>> -void mlx5_vdpa_destroy_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev)
>>> +static void destroy_user_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev, struct mlx5_vdpa_mr *mr)
>>> {
>>> - struct mlx5_vdpa_mr *mr = &mvdev->mr;
>>> struct mlx5_vdpa_direct_mr *dmr;
>>> struct mlx5_vdpa_direct_mr *n;
>>> - mutex_lock(&mr->mkey_mtx);
>>> - if (!mr->initialized)
>>> - goto out;
>>> -
>>> destroy_indirect_key(mvdev, mr);
>>> list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(dmr, n, &mr->head, list) {
>>> list_del_init(&dmr->list);
>>> unmap_direct_mr(mvdev, dmr);
>>> kfree(dmr);
>>> }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void mlx5_vdpa_destroy_mr(struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct mlx5_vdpa_mr *mr = &mvdev->mr;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&mr->mkey_mtx);
>>> + if (!mr->initialized)
>>> + goto out;
>>> +
>>> + if (mr->user_mr)
>>> + destroy_user_mr(mvdev, mr);
>>> + else
>>> + destroy_dma_mr(mvdev, mr);
>>> +
>>> memset(mr, 0, sizeof(*mr));
>>> mr->initialized = false;
>>> out:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>> index fdf3e74bffbd..f16756661c19 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
>>> @@ -1780,6 +1780,8 @@ static void mlx5_vdpa_set_status(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u8 status)
>>> ndev->mvdev.status = 0;
>>> ndev->mvdev.mlx_features = 0;
>>> ++mvdev->generation;
>>> + if (MLX5_CAP_GEN(mvdev->mdev, umem_uid_0))
>>> + mlx5_vdpa_create_mr(mvdev, NULL);
>>
>> I wonder if it's possible/worth to avoid the destroy and re-create of dma MR
>> here. (In the case of it has been used by us).
> If it is a user MR, you must destroy it since it is useless. If it's
> DMA MR, you might be able to do it but since the DMA MR's are
> lightweight, I don't think it's worth it.
Yes, I agree.
Thanks
>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>> return;
>>> }
>>> @@ -1859,6 +1861,7 @@ static void mlx5_vdpa_free(struct vdpa_device *vdev)
>>> ndev = to_mlx5_vdpa_ndev(mvdev);
>>> free_resources(ndev);
>>> + mlx5_vdpa_destroy_mr(mvdev);
>>> mlx5_vdpa_free_resources(&ndev->mvdev);
>>> mutex_destroy(&ndev->reslock);
>>> }
>>> @@ -2023,9 +2026,15 @@ static int mlx5_vdpa_dev_add(struct vdpa_mgmt_dev *v_mdev, const char *name)
>>> if (err)
>>> goto err_mtu;
>>> + if (MLX5_CAP_GEN(mvdev->mdev, umem_uid_0)) {
>>> + err = mlx5_vdpa_create_mr(mvdev, NULL);
>>> + if (err)
>>> + goto err_res;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> err = alloc_resources(ndev);
>>> if (err)
>>> - goto err_res;
>>> + goto err_mr;
>>> mvdev->vdev.mdev = &mgtdev->mgtdev;
>>> err = _vdpa_register_device(&mvdev->vdev, 2 * mlx5_vdpa_max_qps(max_vqs));
>>> @@ -2037,6 +2046,8 @@ static int mlx5_vdpa_dev_add(struct vdpa_mgmt_dev *v_mdev, const char *name)
>>> err_reg:
>>> free_resources(ndev);
>>> +err_mr:
>>> + mlx5_vdpa_destroy_mr(mvdev);
>>> err_res:
>>> mlx5_vdpa_free_resources(&ndev->mvdev);
>>> err_mtu:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists