[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACycT3uo-J3MYdEo0TscENewp3Xnjce8yFLtt6JkK8uZrvsMjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 15:19:26 +0800
From: Yongji Xie <xieyongji@...edance.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v3] virtio-net: Add validation for used length
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 2:49 PM Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
> 在 2021/5/28 下午8:11, Xie Yongji 写道:
> > This adds validation for used length (might come
> > from an untrusted device) to avoid data corruption
> > or loss.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index 073fec4c0df1..01f15b65824c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -732,6 +732,17 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small(struct net_device *dev,
> >
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > xdp_prog = rcu_dereference(rq->xdp_prog);
> > + if (unlikely(len > GOOD_PACKET_LEN)) {
> > + pr_debug("%s: rx error: len %u exceeds max size %d\n",
> > + dev->name, len, GOOD_PACKET_LEN);
> > + dev->stats.rx_length_errors++;
> > + if (xdp_prog)
> > + goto err_xdp;
> > +
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > + put_page(page);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > if (xdp_prog) {
> > struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr = buf + header_offset;
> > struct xdp_frame *xdpf;
> > @@ -888,6 +899,16 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev,
> >
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > xdp_prog = rcu_dereference(rq->xdp_prog);
> > + if (unlikely(len > truesize)) {
> > + pr_debug("%s: rx error: len %u exceeds truesize %lu\n",
> > + dev->name, len, (unsigned long)ctx);
> > + dev->stats.rx_length_errors++;
> > + if (xdp_prog)
> > + goto err_xdp;
> > +
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > + goto err_skb;
> > + }
>
>
> Patch looks correct but I'd rather not bother XDP here. It would be
> better if we just do the check before rcu_read_lock() and use err_skb
> directly() to avoid RCU/XDP stuffs.
>
If so, we will miss the statistics of xdp_drops. Is it OK?
Thanks,
Yongji
Powered by blists - more mailing lists