linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.12 073/296] KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 31 May 2021 15:12:08 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.12 073/296] KVM: arm64: Prevent mixed-width VM creation

From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>

commit 66e94d5cafd4decd4f92d16a022ea587d7f4094f upstream.

It looks like we have tolerated creating mixed-width VMs since...
forever. However, that was never the intention, and we'd rather
not have to support that pointless complexity.

Forbid such a setup by making sure all the vcpus have the same
register width.

Reported-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210524170752.1549797-1-maz@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |    5 +++++
 arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c               |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
@@ -463,4 +463,9 @@ static __always_inline void kvm_incr_pc(
 	vcpu->arch.flags |= KVM_ARM64_INCREMENT_PC;
 }
 
+static inline bool vcpu_has_feature(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int feature)
+{
+	return test_bit(feature, vcpu->arch.features);
+}
+
 #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
@@ -170,6 +170,25 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_enable_ptrauth(struc
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static bool vcpu_allowed_register_width(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu *tmp;
+	bool is32bit;
+	int i;
+
+	is32bit = vcpu_has_feature(vcpu, KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT);
+	if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1) && is32bit)
+		return false;
+
+	/* Check that the vcpus are either all 32bit or all 64bit */
+	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, tmp, vcpu->kvm) {
+		if (vcpu_has_feature(tmp, KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT) != is32bit)
+			return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 /**
  * kvm_reset_vcpu - sets core registers and sys_regs to reset value
  * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
@@ -221,13 +240,14 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu
 		}
 	}
 
+	if (!vcpu_allowed_register_width(vcpu)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
 	default:
 		if (test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_EL1_32BIT, vcpu->arch.features)) {
-			if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1)) {
-				ret = -EINVAL;
-				goto out;
-			}
 			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_SVC;
 		} else {
 			pstate = VCPU_RESET_PSTATE_EL1;