linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.12 274/296] net: lantiq: fix memory corruption in RX ring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210531130712.951598038@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 31 May 2021 15:15:29 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Aleksander Jan Bajkowski <olek2@...pl>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.12 274/296] net: lantiq: fix memory corruption in RX ring

From: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski <olek2@...pl>

[ Upstream commit c7718ee96dbc2f9c5fc3b578abdf296dd44b9c20 ]

In a situation where memory allocation or dma mapping fails, an
invalid address is programmed into the descriptor. This can lead
to memory corruption. If the memory allocation fails, DMA should
reuse the previous skb and mapping and drop the packet. This patch
also increments rx drop counter.

Fixes: fe1a56420cf2 ("net: lantiq: Add Lantiq / Intel VRX200 Ethernet driver ")
Signed-off-by: Aleksander Jan Bajkowski <olek2@...pl>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c | 14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c
index 51ed8a54d380..135ba5b6ae98 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/lantiq_xrx200.c
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ static int xrx200_close(struct net_device *net_dev)
 
 static int xrx200_alloc_skb(struct xrx200_chan *ch)
 {
+	dma_addr_t mapping;
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	ch->skb[ch->dma.desc] = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(ch->priv->net_dev,
@@ -163,16 +164,17 @@ static int xrx200_alloc_skb(struct xrx200_chan *ch)
 		goto skip;
 	}
 
-	ch->dma.desc_base[ch->dma.desc].addr = dma_map_single(ch->priv->dev,
-			ch->skb[ch->dma.desc]->data, XRX200_DMA_DATA_LEN,
-			DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
-	if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(ch->priv->dev,
-				       ch->dma.desc_base[ch->dma.desc].addr))) {
+	mapping = dma_map_single(ch->priv->dev, ch->skb[ch->dma.desc]->data,
+				 XRX200_DMA_DATA_LEN, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
+	if (unlikely(dma_mapping_error(ch->priv->dev, mapping))) {
 		dev_kfree_skb_any(ch->skb[ch->dma.desc]);
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto skip;
 	}
 
+	ch->dma.desc_base[ch->dma.desc].addr = mapping;
+	/* Make sure the address is written before we give it to HW */
+	wmb();
 skip:
 	ch->dma.desc_base[ch->dma.desc].ctl =
 		LTQ_DMA_OWN | LTQ_DMA_RX_OFFSET(NET_IP_ALIGN) |
@@ -196,6 +198,8 @@ static int xrx200_hw_receive(struct xrx200_chan *ch)
 	ch->dma.desc %= LTQ_DESC_NUM;
 
 	if (ret) {
+		ch->skb[ch->dma.desc] = skb;
+		net_dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
 		netdev_err(net_dev, "failed to allocate new rx buffer\n");
 		return ret;
 	}
-- 
2.30.2