[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YLUjCqdPu/8eWuB+@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 19:55:22 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan"
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@...nel.org>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 28/32] x86/tdx: Make pages shared in ioremap()
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:32:44AM -0700, Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan wrote:
> I think above requirement is satisfied in following implementation.
Well, I suggested a single protected_guest_has() function which does:
if (AMD)
amd_protected_guest_has(...)
else if (Intel)
intel_protected_guest_has(...)
else
WARN()
where amd_protected_guest_has() is implemented in arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
and intel_protected_guest_has() is implemented in, as far as I can
follow your paths in the diff, in arch/x86/kernel/tdx.c.
No is_protected_guest() and no ARCH_HAS_PROTECTED_GUEST.
Just the above controlled by CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_GUEST or whatever
the TDX config item is gonna end up being and on the AMD side by
CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists