[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a3facb5-d118-f81b-65f8-381b0d56a23b@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 20:57:07 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Rajeev Nandan <rajeevny@...eaurora.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sean@...rly.run, robdclark@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, abhinavk@...eaurora.org,
kalyan_t@...eaurora.org, mkrishn@...eaurora.org, jonathan@...ek.ca
Subject: Re: [v1 2/3] drm/msm/dsi: Add PHY configuration for SC7280
On 31/05/2021 16:33, Rajeev Nandan wrote:
> The SC7280 SoC uses the 7nm (V4.1) DSI PHY driver with
> different enable|disable regulator loads.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajeev Nandan <rajeevny@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig | 6 +++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig
> index 10f693e..7c9d9f1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Kconfig
> @@ -114,9 +114,9 @@ config DRM_MSM_DSI_10NM_PHY
> Choose this option if DSI PHY on SDM845 is used on the platform.
>
> config DRM_MSM_DSI_7NM_PHY
> - bool "Enable DSI 7nm PHY driver in MSM DRM (used by SM8150/SM8250)"
> + bool "Enable DSI 7nm PHY driver in MSM DRM"
> depends on DRM_MSM_DSI
> default y
> help
> - Choose this option if DSI PHY on SM8150/SM8250 is used on the
> - platform.
> + Choose this option if DSI PHY on SM8150/SM8250/SC7280 is used on
> + the platform.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c
> index ff7f2ec..2770783 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.c
> @@ -593,6 +593,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id dsi_phy_dt_match[] = {
> .data = &dsi_phy_7nm_cfgs },
> { .compatible = "qcom,dsi-phy-7nm-8150",
> .data = &dsi_phy_7nm_8150_cfgs },
> + { .compatible = "qcom,dsi-phy-7nm-7280",
> + .data = &dsi_phy_7nm_7280_cfgs },
> #endif
> {}
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h
> index 94a77ac..bc91dc8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_10nm_cfgs;
> extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_10nm_8998_cfgs;
> extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_7nm_cfgs;
> extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_7nm_8150_cfgs;
> +extern const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_7nm_7280_cfgs;
>
> struct msm_dsi_dphy_timing {
> u32 clk_zero;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c
> index e76ce40..6e30d21 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/phy/dsi_phy_7nm.c
> @@ -998,3 +998,25 @@ const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_7nm_8150_cfgs = {
> .io_start = { 0xae94400, 0xae96400 },
> .num_dsi_phy = 2,
> };
> +
> +const struct msm_dsi_phy_cfg dsi_phy_7nm_7280_cfgs = {
> + .has_phy_lane = true,
> + .reg_cfg = {
> + .num = 1,
> + .regs = {
> + {"vdds", 37550, 0},
> + },
> + },
> + .ops = {
> + .enable = dsi_7nm_phy_enable,
> + .disable = dsi_7nm_phy_disable,
> + .pll_init = dsi_pll_7nm_init,
> + .save_pll_state = dsi_7nm_pll_save_state,
> + .restore_pll_state = dsi_7nm_pll_restore_state,
> + },
> + .min_pll_rate = 600000000UL,
> + .max_pll_rate = (5000000000ULL < ULONG_MAX) ? 5000000000ULL : ULONG_MAX,
Could you please follow the patch by Arnd here?
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20210514213032.575161-1-arnd@kernel.org/
> + .io_start = { 0xae94400, 0xae96400 },
> + .num_dsi_phy = 2,
Judging from the next patch, you have one DSI host and one DSI PHY.
Could you please correct io_start / num_dsi_phy here?
> + .quirks = DSI_PHY_7NM_QUIRK_V4_1,
> +};
With these two issues fixed:
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists