linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] iommu/amd: Fix wrong parentheses on page-specific invalidations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <0CD8AE55-ACE2-4647-B88B-BD8CFB8EF710@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 May 2021 13:11:44 -0700
From:   Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Jiajun Cao <caojiajun@...are.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] iommu/amd: Fix wrong parentheses on page-specific
 invalidations



> On May 18, 2021, at 2:23 AM, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, May 01, 2021 at 11:59:56PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
>> 
>> The logic to determine the mask of page-specific invalidations was
>> tested in userspace. As the code was copied into the kernel, the
>> parentheses were mistakenly set in the wrong place, resulting in the
>> wrong mask.
>> 
>> Fix it.
>> 
>> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
>> Cc: Jiajun Cao <caojiajun@...are.com>
>> Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>> Fixes: 268aa4548277 ("iommu/amd: Page-specific invalidations for more than one page")
>> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Applied this one for v5.13, thanks Nadav.
> 
> Somehow the rest of the patch-set got screwed up during sending or so,
> at least I see some patches twice in my inbox and with different
> subjects.
> 
> Can you please re-send patches 2-4 when -rc3 it out?

Joerg,

Thanks for your understanding. I sent a version based on -rc3 a week
ago.

I noticed that there was some confusion regarding rc numbers. Do you
need a new version based on rc4 or can you apply the version I sent?

Thanks,
Nadav


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)