linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: typec: mux: Remove requirement for the "orientation-switch" device property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YLSW0IoHdnzRSzUW@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 May 2021 10:57:04 +0300
From:   Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jun Li <jun.li@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: typec: mux: Remove requirement for the
 "orientation-switch" device property

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:24:35AM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 07:26:43AM +0000, Jun Li wrote:
> > Hi,
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 11:36 PM
> > > To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>; Hans de Goede
> > > <hdegoede@...hat.com>; Jun Li <jun.li@....com>
> > > Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] usb: typec: mux: Remove requirement for the
> > > "orientation-switch" device property
> > > 
> > > The additional boolean device property "orientation-switch"
> > > is not needed when the connection is described with device graph, so removing
> > > the check and the requirement for it.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/usb/typec/mux.c | 3 ---
> > >  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c b/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c index
> > > e40a555724fb6..603f3e698cc0b 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c
> > > @@ -30,9 +30,6 @@ static void *typec_switch_match(struct fwnode_handle
> > > *fwnode, const char *id,  {
> > >  	struct device *dev;
> > > 
> > > -	if (id && !fwnode_property_present(fwnode, id))
> > > -		return NULL;
> > > -
> > 
> > May this change the result of fwnode_connection_find_match()
> > if there are multiple remote-endpoint node?
> > 
> > After the 2 patches change, typec_switch_match() will never
> > return NULL, so
> > 
> >   17 static void *
> >   18 fwnode_graph_devcon_match(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *con_id,
> >   19                           void *data, devcon_match_fn_t match)
> >   20 {               
> >   21         struct fwnode_handle *node;
> >   22         struct fwnode_handle *ep;
> >   23         void *ret;
> >   24                         
> >   25         fwnode_graph_for_each_endpoint(fwnode, ep) {
> >   26                 node = fwnode_graph_get_remote_port_parent(ep);
> >   27                 if (!fwnode_device_is_available(node))
> >   28                         continue;
> >   29 
> >   30                 ret = match(node, con_id, data);// ret can't be NULL;
> >   31                 fwnode_handle_put(node); 
> >   32                 if (ret) {
> > 							 /*
> > 							  * So loop will go to here and stop
> > 							  * checking next ep, even this ep
> > 							  * actually is not for typec_switch
> > 							  */
> >   33                         fwnode_handle_put(ep);
> >   34                         return ret;
> >   35                 }
> >   36         }
> >   37         return NULL;
> >   38 }
> > 
> > fwnode_graph_devcon_match() Will return ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER)
> > even this ep's remote parent already probed but it's not for
> > typec_switch.
> 
> You are correct. With device graph I guess we really always need the
> extra device property after all.
> 
> So let's forget about this one.

Oh no. This patch just landed into Greg's usb-next. I'll prepare the
revert. I'm sorry about this.

thanks,

-- 
heikki