[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf3a9cf9-fc72-8ea4-de0a-1f0e123cb644@microchip.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 08:52:34 +0000
From: <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To: <michael@...le.cc>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <p.yadav@...com>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>,
<vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] mtd: spi-nor: otp: return -EROFS if region is
read-only
On 5/21/21 10:40 PM, Michael Walle wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> SPI NOR flashes will just ignore program commands if the OTP region is
> locked. Thus, a user might not notice that the intended write didn't end
> up in the flash. Return -EROFS to the user in this case. From what I can
> tell, chips/cfi_cmdset_0001.c also return this error code.
>
> One could optimize spi_nor_mtd_otp_range_is_locked() to read the status
> register only once and not for every OTP region, but for that we would
> need some more invasive changes. Given that this is
> one-time-programmable memory and the normal access mode is reading, we
> just live with the small overhead.
:)
Shouldn't we change
struct spi_nor_otp_ops {
...
int (*lock)(struct spi_nor *nor, unsigned int region);
int (*is_locked)(struct spi_nor *nor, unsigned int region);
};
to:
struct spi_nor_otp_ops {
...
int (*lock)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t addr, size_t len);
int (*is_locked)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t addr, size_t len);
};
instead?
>
> Fixes: 069089acf88b ("mtd: spi-nor: add OTP support")
> Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/otp.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/otp.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/otp.c
> index 3898ed67ba1c..b87f96593c13 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/otp.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/otp.c
> @@ -249,6 +249,31 @@ static int spi_nor_mtd_otp_info(struct mtd_info *mtd, size_t len,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int spi_nor_mtd_otp_range_is_locked(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs,
> + size_t len)
> +{
> + const struct spi_nor_otp_ops *ops = nor->params->otp.ops;
> + unsigned int region;
> + int locked;
> +
> + if (!len)
> + return 0;
> +
> + /*
> + * If any of the affected OTP regions are locked the entire range is
> + * considered locked.
> + */
> + for (region = spi_nor_otp_offset_to_region(nor, ofs);
> + region <= spi_nor_otp_offset_to_region(nor, ofs + len - 1);
> + region++) {
> + locked = ops->is_locked(nor, region);
> + if (locked)
> + return locked;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int spi_nor_mtd_otp_read_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs,
> size_t total_len, size_t *retlen,
> const u8 *buf, bool is_write)
> @@ -271,6 +296,16 @@ static int spi_nor_mtd_otp_read_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs,
> /* don't access beyond the end */
> total_len = min_t(size_t, total_len, spi_nor_otp_size(nor) - ofs);
>
> + if (is_write) {
> + ret = spi_nor_mtd_otp_range_is_locked(nor, ofs, total_len);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + goto out;
> + } else if (ret) {
> + ret = -EROFS;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +
> *retlen = 0;
> while (total_len) {
> /*
> --
> 2.20.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists