[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YLSqD+9nZIWJpn+r@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 11:19:11 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, michal.simek@...inx.com,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dmaengine: usb-dmac: Fix PM reference leak in
usb_dmac_probe()
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 02:27:34PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 31-05-21, 14:11, yukuai (C) wrote:
> > On 2021/05/31 12:00, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > On 17-05-21, 16:18, Yu Kuai wrote:
> > > > pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it failed.
> > > > Forgetting to putting operation will result in reference leak here.
> > > > Fix it by replacing it with pm_runtime_resume_and_get to keep usage
> > > > counter balanced.
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/dma/sh/usb-dmac.c | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/sh/usb-dmac.c b/drivers/dma/sh/usb-dmac.c
> > > > index 8f7ceb698226..2a6c8fd8854e 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/dma/sh/usb-dmac.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/dma/sh/usb-dmac.c
> > > > @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static int usb_dmac_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > /* Enable runtime PM and initialize the device. */
> > > > pm_runtime_enable(&pdev->dev);
> > > > - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
> > > > + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
> > >
> > > This does not seem to fix anything.. the below goto goes and disables
> > > the runtime_pm for this device and thus there wont be any leak
> > Hi,
> >
> > If pm_runtime_get_sync() fails and increments the pm.usage_count
> > variable, pm_runtime_disable() does not reset the counter, and
> > we still need to decrement the usage count when pm_runtime_get_sync()
> > fails. Do I miss anthing?
>
> Yes the rumtime_pm is disabled on failure here and the count would have
> no consequence...
You should still balance the PM usage counter as it isn't reset for
example when reloading the driver.
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() is one way of handling this, but
alternatively you could also move the error_pm label above the
pm_runtime_put() in the error path.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists