[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD-N9QUTZ49CvrhW76pTUDOp8y=29JXxR45Z_W53qVz0PJHVLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 18:35:33 +0800
From: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
syzbot+08a7d8b51ea048a74ffb@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: control led: fix memory leak in snd_ctl_led_register
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 5:38 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 05:10:49PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> > Hi Dan,
> >
> > I wonder if we shall split the current patch into two patches, one
> > patch for each memory leak. It is better to satisfy the rule - "one
> > patch only fixes one issue".
> >
> > We should absolutely fix all these memory leaks. But one patch for two
> > different bugs with different objects and different paths is not very
> > suitable.
> >
>
> I would just send one patch, because I only see it as one bug. But you
> do what you think is best.
If you think they are the same bug, that's great. Just send and apply
only one patch as it is. I will not send version v2.
BTW, could you please show me the syzbot link for the bug you tried to
resolve? If it is not from syzbot dashboard, can you please show the
bug report?
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists