lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <162245764385.29796.9800747748903959917.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date:   Mon, 31 May 2021 10:40:43 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Marco Elver" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     syzbot+142c9018f5962db69c7e@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: perf/urgent] perf: Fix data race between pin_count increment/decrement

The following commit has been merged into the perf/urgent branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     6c605f8371159432ec61cbb1488dcf7ad24ad19a
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/6c605f8371159432ec61cbb1488dcf7ad24ad19a
Author:        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
AuthorDate:    Thu, 27 May 2021 12:47:11 +02:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 31 May 2021 10:14:51 +02:00

perf: Fix data race between pin_count increment/decrement

KCSAN reports a data race between increment and decrement of pin_count:

  write to 0xffff888237c2d4e0 of 4 bytes by task 15740 on cpu 1:
   find_get_context		kernel/events/core.c:4617
   __do_sys_perf_event_open	kernel/events/core.c:12097 [inline]
   __se_sys_perf_event_open	kernel/events/core.c:11933
   ...
  read to 0xffff888237c2d4e0 of 4 bytes by task 15743 on cpu 0:
   perf_unpin_context		kernel/events/core.c:1525 [inline]
   __do_sys_perf_event_open	kernel/events/core.c:12328 [inline]
   __se_sys_perf_event_open	kernel/events/core.c:11933
   ...

Because neither read-modify-write here is atomic, this can lead to one
of the operations being lost, resulting in an inconsistent pin_count.
Fix it by adding the missing locking in the CPU-event case.

Fixes: fe4b04fa31a6 ("perf: Cure task_oncpu_function_call() races")
Reported-by: syzbot+142c9018f5962db69c7e@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210527104711.2671610-1-elver@google.com
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 6fee4a7..fe88d6e 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -4609,7 +4609,9 @@ find_get_context(struct pmu *pmu, struct task_struct *task,
 		cpuctx = per_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context, cpu);
 		ctx = &cpuctx->ctx;
 		get_ctx(ctx);
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->lock, flags);
 		++ctx->pin_count;
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->lock, flags);
 
 		return ctx;
 	}

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ