linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ALSA: control led: fix memory leak in snd_ctl_led

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD-N9QXAq73E5DrzkK6gULaBAQ4FrO5_OCndWZpOmSgPTAiqrw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 31 May 2021 18:59:18 +0800
From:   Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzbot+08a7d8b51ea048a74ffb@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: control led: fix memory leak in snd_ctl_led_register

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 6:44 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 06:35:33PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 5:38 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 05:10:49PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote:
> > > > Hi Dan,
> > > >
> > > > I wonder if we shall split the current patch into two patches, one
> > > > patch for each memory leak. It is better to satisfy the rule - "one
> > > > patch only fixes one issue".
> > > >
> > > > We should absolutely fix all these memory leaks. But one patch for two
> > > > different bugs with different objects and different paths is not very
> > > > suitable.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I would just send one patch, because I only see it as one bug.  But you
> > > do what you think is best.
> >
> > If you think they are the same bug, that's great. Just send and apply
> > only one patch as it is. I will not send version v2.
>
> Sorry for the miscommunication.  That's not what I meant at all.
>
> Your patch only introduces one put_device().  We need all five to fix
> the bug, and we'll have to change the kfree(link_whatever).  Use
> device_unregister() instead put_device().  Include a Reported-by with
> the correct syzkaller information.
>
> >
> > BTW, could you please show me the syzbot link for the bug you tried to
> > resolve? If it is not from syzbot dashboard, can you please show the
> > bug report?
>
> What are you talking about?  I'm not trying to fix a syzkaller bug.  I'm
> just reviewing your patch.

It seems we truly have some miscommunication. Your message makes me
think you are fixing another bug report that shares the same root
cause with this bug.

Now let's sync and get on the same page.

You are trying to give me some suggestions to fix this bug. I need to
listen to your advice and send another version v2 to you developers.
Right?

>
> regards,
> dan carpenter