[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG3jFyvOtEoTGVp8WaqNgeHB20PSmEXR6mJykyridAG55aa9rw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 13:11:55 +0200
From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
To: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
Cc: MSM <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andrey.konovalov@...aro.org>,
Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
"open list:QUALCOMM CAMERA SUBSYSTEM DRIVER"
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/17] media: camss: vfe-170: clean up some dead code
On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 20:08, Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca> wrote:
>
> vfe_isr_read()/vfe_isr_halt_ack()/vfe_reg_clr() are never called.
>
> vfe_isr_sof() does nothing, remove it.
>
> The only vfe_reg_set() usage can be easily replaced with a writel.
>
> Fixes: 7319cdf189bb ("media: camss: Add support for VFE hardware version Titan 170")
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
> ---
> .../media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-170.c | 53 +------------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-170.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-170.c
> index 8594d275b41d..076ca082e107 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-170.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/camss-vfe-170.c
> @@ -188,20 +188,6 @@ static void vfe_hw_version_read(struct vfe_device *vfe, struct device *dev)
> dev_err(dev, "VFE HW Version = %u.%u.%u\n", gen, rev, step);
> }
>
> -static inline void vfe_reg_clr(struct vfe_device *vfe, u32 reg, u32 clr_bits)
> -{
> - u32 bits = readl_relaxed(vfe->base + reg);
> -
> - writel_relaxed(bits & ~clr_bits, vfe->base + reg);
> -}
> -
> -static inline void vfe_reg_set(struct vfe_device *vfe, u32 reg, u32 set_bits)
> -{
> - u32 bits = readl_relaxed(vfe->base + reg);
> -
> - writel_relaxed(bits | set_bits, vfe->base + reg);
> -}
> -
> static void vfe_global_reset(struct vfe_device *vfe)
> {
> u32 reset_bits = GLOBAL_RESET_CMD_CORE |
> @@ -305,32 +291,14 @@ static inline void vfe_reg_update_clear(struct vfe_device *vfe,
>
> static void vfe_enable_irq_common(struct vfe_device *vfe)
> {
> - vfe_reg_set(vfe, VFE_IRQ_MASK_0, ~0u);
> - vfe_reg_set(vfe, VFE_IRQ_MASK_1, ~0u);
> + writel_relaxed(~0u, vfe->base + VFE_IRQ_MASK_0);
> + writel_relaxed(~0u, vfe->base + VFE_IRQ_MASK_1);
>
> writel_relaxed(~0u, vfe->base + VFE_BUS_IRQ_MASK(0));
> writel_relaxed(~0u, vfe->base + VFE_BUS_IRQ_MASK(1));
> writel_relaxed(~0u, vfe->base + VFE_BUS_IRQ_MASK(2));
> }
>
> -static void vfe_isr_halt_ack(struct vfe_device *vfe)
> -{
> - complete(&vfe->halt_complete);
> -}
> -
> -static void vfe_isr_read(struct vfe_device *vfe, u32 *status0, u32 *status1)
> -{
> - *status0 = readl_relaxed(vfe->base + VFE_IRQ_STATUS_0);
> - *status1 = readl_relaxed(vfe->base + VFE_IRQ_STATUS_1);
> -
> - writel_relaxed(*status0, vfe->base + VFE_IRQ_CLEAR_0);
> - writel_relaxed(*status1, vfe->base + VFE_IRQ_CLEAR_1);
> -
> - /* Enforce ordering between IRQ Clear and Global IRQ Clear */
> - wmb();
> - writel_relaxed(CMD_GLOBAL_CLEAR, vfe->base + VFE_IRQ_CMD);
> -}
> -
> static void vfe_violation_read(struct vfe_device *vfe)
> {
> u32 violation = readl_relaxed(vfe->base + VFE_VIOLATION_STATUS);
> @@ -375,10 +343,6 @@ static irqreturn_t vfe_isr(int irq, void *dev)
> if (status0 & STATUS_0_RDI_REG_UPDATE(i))
> vfe->isr_ops.reg_update(vfe, i);
>
> - for (i = VFE_LINE_RDI0; i <= VFE_LINE_RDI2; i++)
> - if (status0 & STATUS_1_RDI_SOF(i))
> - vfe->isr_ops.sof(vfe, i);
> -
> for (i = 0; i < MSM_VFE_COMPOSITE_IRQ_NUM; i++)
> if (vfe_bus_status[0] & STATUS0_COMP_BUF_DONE(i))
> vfe->isr_ops.comp_done(vfe, i);
> @@ -607,16 +571,6 @@ static int vfe_disable(struct vfe_line *line)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * vfe_isr_sof - Process start of frame interrupt
> - * @vfe: VFE Device
> - * @line_id: VFE line
> - */
> -static void vfe_isr_sof(struct vfe_device *vfe, enum vfe_line_id line_id)
> -{
> - /* nop */
> -}
> -
> /*
> * vfe_isr_reg_update - Process reg update interrupt
> * @vfe: VFE Device
> @@ -749,9 +703,7 @@ static int vfe_queue_buffer(struct camss_video *vid,
>
> static const struct vfe_isr_ops vfe_isr_ops_170 = {
> .reset_ack = vfe_isr_reset_ack,
> - .halt_ack = vfe_isr_halt_ack,
> .reg_update = vfe_isr_reg_update,
> - .sof = vfe_isr_sof,
> .comp_done = vfe_isr_comp_done,
> .wm_done = vfe_isr_wm_done,
> };
> @@ -772,7 +724,6 @@ static void vfe_subdev_init(struct device *dev, struct vfe_device *vfe)
> const struct vfe_hw_ops vfe_ops_170 = {
> .global_reset = vfe_global_reset,
> .hw_version_read = vfe_hw_version_read,
> - .isr_read = vfe_isr_read,
> .isr = vfe_isr,
> .pm_domain_off = vfe_pm_domain_off,
> .pm_domain_on = vfe_pm_domain_on,
Gen1 & gen2 seem to diverge in terms of which ISR & helpers are
needed. Should the vfe_isr_ops & vfe_hw_ops structs have generation
based versions? I'm fine with a no here. There are diminishing returns
to this pedantism.
With ^^^ covered, feel free to add my r-b.
Reviewed-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@...aro.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists