[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7c435436-cf38-7c09-9141-8410a8c18cc8@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 08:51:30 +0800
From: Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To: "yekai(A)" <yekai13@...wei.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wangzhou1@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH 2/3] crypto: hisilicon/sec - add fallback
tfm supporting for XTS mode
On 5/29/21 5:22 PM, yekai(A) wrote:
>
>
> On 2021/5/28 22:13, kernel test robot wrote:
>> Hi Kai,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on cryptodev/master]
>> [also build test ERROR on crypto/master linux/master linus/master
>> v5.13-rc3 next-20210528]
>> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>>
>> url:
>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Kai-Ye/crypto-hisilicon-supports-new-skciphers-for-new-hardware/20210528-194644
>> base:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/herbert/cryptodev-2.6.git
>> master
>> config: ia64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
>> compiler: ia64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>> wget
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross
>> -O ~/bin/make.cross
>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>> #
>> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/60bae5ed49c53ea90c82125a8295fb72833a3b68
>> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
>> git fetch --no-tags linux-review
>> Kai-Ye/crypto-hisilicon-supports-new-skciphers-for-new-hardware/20210528-194644
>> git checkout 60bae5ed49c53ea90c82125a8295fb72833a3b68
>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0
>> make.cross ARCH=ia64
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c: In function
>> 'sec_aead_crypto':
>>>> drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c:1751:40: error: 'sk_req'
>>>> undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'a_req'?
>> 1751 | return sec_skcipher_soft_crypto(ctx, sk_req, encrypt);
>> | ^~~~~~
>> | a_req
>> drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c:1751:40: note: each
>> undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it
>> appears in
>>
>>
>> vim +1751 drivers/crypto/hisilicon/sec2/sec_crypto.c
>>
>> 1733
>> 1734 static int sec_aead_crypto(struct aead_request *a_req, bool
>> encrypt)
>> 1735 {
>> 1736 struct crypto_aead *tfm = crypto_aead_reqtfm(a_req);
>> 1737 struct sec_req *req = aead_request_ctx(a_req);
>> 1738 struct sec_ctx *ctx = crypto_aead_ctx(tfm);
>> 1739 int ret;
>> 1740
>> 1741 req->flag = a_req->base.flags;
>> 1742 req->aead_req.aead_req = a_req;
>> 1743 req->c_req.encrypt = encrypt;
>> 1744 req->ctx = ctx;
>> 1745
>> 1746 ret = sec_aead_param_check(ctx, req);
>> 1747 if (unlikely(ret))
>> 1748 return -EINVAL;
>> 1749
>> 1750 if (unlikely(ctx->c_ctx.fallback))
>>> 1751 return sec_skcipher_soft_crypto(ctx, sk_req, encrypt);
>> 1752
>> 1753 return ctx->req_op->process(ctx, req);
>> 1754 }
>> 1755
>>
>> ---
>> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
>> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
>>
>
>
> You shouldn't git am this patchset directly, because this patchset
> depends on previous patchset.
> the series is "crypto: hisilicon - add new type of sqe for Kunpeng930",
> the patchwork is
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-crypto/list/?series=490143,
> thank you
> Kai
Hi Kai,
Thanks for the clarification, it could be very helpful for us if
'--base' for git format-patch used or
there is a patchwork link in cover letter file.
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists