| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20210531130641.522171175@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 15:13:36 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Frank van der Linden <fllinden@...zon.com>,
Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 040/116] bpf: fix up selftests after backports were fixed
From: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@...driver.com>
After the backport of the changes to fix CVE 2019-7308, the
selftests also need to be fixed up, as was done originally
in mainline 80c9b2fae87b ("bpf: add various test cases to selftests").
This is a backport of upstream commit 80c9b2fae87b ("bpf: add various test
cases to selftests") adapted to 4.19 in order to fix the
selftests that began to fail after CVE-2019-7308 fixes.
Suggested-by: Frank van der Linden <fllinden@...zon.com>
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -2448,6 +2448,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.result = REJECT,
.errstr = "invalid stack off=-79992 size=8",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
},
{
"PTR_TO_STACK store/load - out of bounds high",
@@ -2844,6 +2845,8 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, -8),
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
},
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
{
@@ -7457,6 +7460,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -7481,6 +7485,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -7507,6 +7512,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R8 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -7532,6 +7538,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R8 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -7580,6 +7587,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -7651,6 +7659,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -7702,6 +7711,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -7729,6 +7739,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -7755,6 +7766,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -7784,6 +7796,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R7 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -7814,6 +7827,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map1 = { 4 },
.errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'inv'",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -7842,6 +7856,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.errstr = "unbounded min value",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
.result_unpriv = REJECT,
},
@@ -7894,6 +7909,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.errstr = "R0 min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 has unknown scalar with mixed signed bounds",
.result = REJECT,
},
{
@@ -8266,6 +8282,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.errstr = "pointer offset 1073741822",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
.result = REJECT
},
{
@@ -8287,6 +8304,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
},
.fixup_map1 = { 3 },
.errstr = "pointer offset -1073741822",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R0 pointer arithmetic of map value goes out of range",
.result = REJECT
},
{
@@ -8458,6 +8476,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
BPF_EXIT_INSN()
},
.errstr = "fp pointer offset 1073741822",
+ .errstr_unpriv = "R1 stack pointer arithmetic goes out of range",
.result = REJECT
},
{
Powered by blists - more mailing lists