[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210531130642.106387425@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 15:13:53 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 057/116] bpf: Fix mask direction swap upon off reg sign change
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
commit bb01a1bba579b4b1c5566af24d95f1767859771e upstream
Masking direction as indicated via mask_to_left is considered to be
calculated once and then used to derive pointer limits. Thus, this
needs to be placed into bpf_sanitize_info instead so we can pass it
to sanitize_ptr_alu() call after the pointer move. Piotr noticed a
corner case where the off reg causes masking direction change which
then results in an incorrect final aux->alu_limit.
Fixes: 7fedb63a8307 ("bpf: Tighten speculative pointer arithmetic mask")
Reported-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@...il.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait@...driver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2738,18 +2738,10 @@ enum {
};
static int retrieve_ptr_limit(const struct bpf_reg_state *ptr_reg,
- const struct bpf_reg_state *off_reg,
- u32 *alu_limit, u8 opcode)
+ u32 *alu_limit, bool mask_to_left)
{
- bool off_is_neg = off_reg->smin_value < 0;
- bool mask_to_left = (opcode == BPF_ADD && off_is_neg) ||
- (opcode == BPF_SUB && !off_is_neg);
u32 max = 0, ptr_limit = 0;
- if (!tnum_is_const(off_reg->var_off) &&
- (off_reg->smin_value < 0) != (off_reg->smax_value < 0))
- return REASON_BOUNDS;
-
switch (ptr_reg->type) {
case PTR_TO_STACK:
/* Offset 0 is out-of-bounds, but acceptable start for the
@@ -2817,6 +2809,7 @@ static bool sanitize_needed(u8 opcode)
struct bpf_sanitize_info {
struct bpf_insn_aux_data aux;
+ bool mask_to_left;
};
static int sanitize_ptr_alu(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
@@ -2848,7 +2841,16 @@ static int sanitize_ptr_alu(struct bpf_v
if (vstate->speculative)
goto do_sim;
- err = retrieve_ptr_limit(ptr_reg, off_reg, &alu_limit, opcode);
+ if (!commit_window) {
+ if (!tnum_is_const(off_reg->var_off) &&
+ (off_reg->smin_value < 0) != (off_reg->smax_value < 0))
+ return REASON_BOUNDS;
+
+ info->mask_to_left = (opcode == BPF_ADD && off_is_neg) ||
+ (opcode == BPF_SUB && !off_is_neg);
+ }
+
+ err = retrieve_ptr_limit(ptr_reg, &alu_limit, info->mask_to_left);
if (err < 0)
return err;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists