linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] docs: Convert the Speakup guide to rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Jun 2021 23:57:23 +0200
From:   Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
To:     Igor Torrente <igormtorrente@...il.com>
Cc:     Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, corbet@....net,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, grandmaster@...klimov.de,
        rdunlap@...radead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] docs: Convert the Speakup guide to rst

Igor Torrente, le mar. 01 juin 2021 12:11:26 -0300, a ecrit:
> > > +| acntsa -- Accent SA
> > > +| acntpc -- Accent PC
> > > +| apollo -- Apollo
> > > +| audptr -- Audapter
> > > +| bns -- Braille 'n Speak
> > > +| dectlk -- DecTalk Express (old and new, db9 serial only)
> > > +| decext -- DecTalk (old) External
> > > +| dtlk -- DoubleTalk PC
> > > +| keypc -- Keynote Gold PC
> > > +| ltlk -- DoubleTalk LT, LiteTalk, or external Tripletalk (db9 serial only)
> > > +| spkout -- Speak Out
> > > +| txprt -- Transport
> > > +| dummy -- Plain text terminal
> > 
> > Looks like a definition list?
> > 
> > https://docutils.sourceforge.io/docs/user/rst/quickref.html#definition-lists
> 
> If the '|' is replaced by definition-list, I'll have to skip a line to each
> item so the sphinx doesn't concatenate them into a single line. Like this:
> 
> keywords
>   acntsa -- Accent SA
> 
>   acntpc -- Accent PC
> 
>   apollo -- Apollo
>   [...]
> 
> 
> There's a way to do that without these blank lines?

The blank line isn't really a problem.

> > > +Document License
> > > +================
> > > +
> > 
> > Using SPDX might be nice.
> 
> I was just trying to respect the original text as much as possible, but I
> don't mind change it if everybody agrees with it.

SPDX should be fine.

Samuel