linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation/submitting-patches: Document RESEND tag on patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <452a0c53-8dae-870b-fd7b-807ade28701c@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 1 Jun 2021 15:31:05 -0700
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     x86-ml <x86@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/submitting-patches: Document RESEND tag on
 patches

On 6/1/21 3:27 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> writes:
> 
>> Wow, time flies. :-\
>>
>> A month and a half later, Jon, how about it?
> 
> Oops...somehow I missed the fact that there was something there for me
> to look at and respond to, sorry.
> 
> I've just read it through...  if it were me, I would find a way to
> reduce its bulk in the hope that people would actually read it; much of
> what's there is in coding-style.rst (or should be).  But it's not me,
> and if you want to keep it I won't whine (much).  Except about reverse
> fir tree, perhaps, but nobody listens to me on that...:)  I'd say
> package it up as a maintainer-guide entry and go for it.

Yes, as a maintainer-profile/guide/whatever, please,
for X86/tip.

Same for several other feedback comments on patches that
are destined for the tip tree.

thanks.
-- 
~Randy