linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: cleanup some dev_err

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <162259047131.4130789.3552758881567534695@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 01 Jun 2021 16:34:31 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: cleanup some dev_err_probe() calls

Quoting Dan Carpenter (2021-05-11 00:09:08)
> The dev_err_probe() function prints an error message if the error
> code is not -EPROBE_DEFER.  If we know the error code in is -ENODEV
> then there is no reason to check.  Conversely, we do not need to
> check for -EPROBE_DEFER before calling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> ---

Applied to clk-next with some manual effort