linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm,memory_hotplug: Drop unneeded locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <679d311a-8ad4-bb53-18f0-11190a2bf1b5@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Jun 2021 10:47:31 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To:     Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,memory_hotplug: Drop unneeded locking



On 5/31/21 3:09 PM, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> Currently, memory-hotplug code takes zone's span_writelock
> and pgdat's resize_lock when resizing the node/zone's spanned
> pages via {move_pfn_range_to_zone(),remove_pfn_range_from_zone()}
> and when resizing node and zone's present pages via
> adjust_present_page_count().
> 
> These locks are also taken during the initialization of the system
> at boot time, where it protects parallel struct page initialization,
> but they should not really be needed in memory-hotplug where all
> operations are a) synchronized on device level and b) serialized by
> the mem_hotplug_lock lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> ---
>  mm/memory_hotplug.c | 11 -----------
>  1 file changed, 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 075b34803fec..9edbc57055bf 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -329,7 +329,6 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
>  	unsigned long pfn;
>  	int nid = zone_to_nid(zone);
>  
> -	zone_span_writelock(zone);
>  	if (zone->zone_start_pfn == start_pfn) {
>  		/*
>  		 * If the section is smallest section in the zone, it need
> @@ -362,7 +361,6 @@ static void shrink_zone_span(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
>  			zone->spanned_pages = 0;
>  		}
>  	}
> -	zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
>  }
>  
>  static void update_pgdat_span(struct pglist_data *pgdat)
> @@ -424,10 +422,8 @@ void __ref remove_pfn_range_from_zone(struct zone *zone,
>  
>  	clear_zone_contiguous(zone);
>  
> -	pgdat_resize_lock(zone->zone_pgdat, &flags);
>  	shrink_zone_span(zone, start_pfn, start_pfn + nr_pages);
>  	update_pgdat_span(pgdat);
> -	pgdat_resize_unlock(zone->zone_pgdat, &flags);
>  
>  	set_zone_contiguous(zone);
>  }
> @@ -638,15 +634,10 @@ void __ref move_pfn_range_to_zone(struct zone *zone, unsigned long start_pfn,
>  
>  	clear_zone_contiguous(zone);
>  
> -	/* TODO Huh pgdat is irqsave while zone is not. It used to be like that before */
> -	pgdat_resize_lock(pgdat, &flags);
> -	zone_span_writelock(zone);
>  	if (zone_is_empty(zone))
>  		init_currently_empty_zone(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
>  	resize_zone_range(zone, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> -	zone_span_writeunlock(zone);
>  	resize_pgdat_range(pgdat, start_pfn, nr_pages);
> -	pgdat_resize_unlock(pgdat, &flags);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Subsection population requires care in pfn_to_online_page().
> @@ -739,9 +730,7 @@ void adjust_present_page_count(struct zone *zone, long nr_pages)
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	zone->present_pages += nr_pages;
> -	pgdat_resize_lock(zone->zone_pgdat, &flags);
>  	zone->zone_pgdat->node_present_pages += nr_pages;
> -	pgdat_resize_unlock(zone->zone_pgdat, &flags);
>  }
>  
>  int mhp_init_memmap_on_memory(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long nr_pages,
> 

Should also just drop zone_span_write[lock|unlock]() helpers as there
are no users left ?