[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YLYCg3VF+rzmGiJj@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 11:48:51 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] perf auxtrace: Optimize barriers with
load-acquire and store-release
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 12:45:16PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 1/06/21 12:17 pm, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 12:07:31PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> >> __sync_xxx_compare_and_swap is out-of-date now. This page:
> >>
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fsync-Builtins.html#g_t_005f_005fsync-Builtins
> >>
> >> recommends '__atomic' builtins instead.
> >
> > perf doesn't seem to use that.
>
> I guess we could drop support for the compat case; add validation:
>
> "Error, 32-bit perf cannot record AUX area traces from a 64-bit kernel.
> Please use a 64-bit version of perf instead."
For AUX, possibly, sadly the exact same problem exists for the normal
buffer IIRC.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists