[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210601092949.GA6961@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 11:29:50 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Ruiqi Gong <gongruiqi1@...wei.com>
Cc: Wang Weiyang <wangweiyang2@...wei.com>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] MIPS: pm-cps: Make '__pcpu_scope_cps_cpu_state'
static
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 03:04:37PM +0800, Ruiqi Gong wrote:
> Mark the per-CPU definition of cps_cpu_state as static to fix the following
> sparse tool complain:
>
> arch/mips/kernel/pm-cps.c:66:1: warning:
> symbol '__pcpu_scope_cps_cpu_state' was not declared. Should it be static?
did you compile/link a kernel with this patch ? I doubt that since there
is a refernec to this symbol in arch/mips/kernel/cps-vec.S.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists