[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL9mu0+ccyCUFoRP7ypNmS9TUCh_A=y0uNxgF9gb-UbB3C18Cw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 19:58:44 +0800
From: Dillon Min <dillon.minfei@...il.com>
To: Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>
Cc: pierre-yves.mordret@...s.st.com, alain.volmat@...s.st.com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
christian.koenig@....com,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] i2c: stm32f4: Fix stmpe811 get xyz data timeout issue
Hi Patrice, Pierre-Yves, Alain
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 7:43 PM Patrice CHOTARD
<patrice.chotard@...s.st.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Dillon
>
> On 5/14/21 1:02 PM, dillon.minfei@...il.com wrote:
> > From: Dillon Min <dillon.minfei@...il.com>
> >
> > As stm32f429's internal flash is 2Mbytes and compiled kernel
> > image bigger than 2Mbytes, so we have to load kernel image
> > to sdram on stm32f429-disco board which has 8Mbytes sdram space.
> >
> > based on above context, as you knows kernel running on external
> > sdram is more slower than internal flash. besides, we need read 4
> > bytes to get touch screen xyz(x, y, pressure) coordinate data in
> > stmpe811 interrupt.
> >
> > so, in stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_done, as i2c read slower than running
> > in xip mode, have to adjust 'STOP/START bit set position' from last
> > two bytes to last one bytes. else, will get i2c timeout in reading
> > touch screen coordinate.
> >
> > to not bring in side effect, introduce IIC_LAST_BYTE_POS to support xip
> > kernel or zImage.
> >
> > Fixes: 62817fc8d282 ("i2c: stm32f4: add driver")
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1591709203-12106-5-git-send-email-dillon.minfei@gmail.com/
> > Signed-off-by: Dillon Min <dillon.minfei@...il.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c | 12 +++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c
> > index 4933fc8ce3fd..2e41231b9037 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-stm32f4.c
> > @@ -93,6 +93,12 @@
> > #define STM32F4_I2C_MAX_FREQ 46U
> > #define HZ_TO_MHZ 1000000
> >
> > +#if !defined(CONFIG_MMU) && !defined(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL)
> > +#define IIC_LAST_BYTE_POS 1
> > +#else
> > +#define IIC_LAST_BYTE_POS 2
> > +#endif
> > +
> > /**
> > * struct stm32f4_i2c_msg - client specific data
> > * @addr: 8-bit slave addr, including r/w bit
> > @@ -439,7 +445,7 @@ static void stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_done(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> > int i;
> >
> > switch (msg->count) {
> > - case 2:
> > + case IIC_LAST_BYTE_POS:
> > /*
> > * In order to correctly send the Stop or Repeated Start
> > * condition on the I2C bus, the STOP/START bit has to be set
> > @@ -454,7 +460,7 @@ static void stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_done(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> > else
> > stm32f4_i2c_set_bits(reg, STM32F4_I2C_CR1_START);
> >
> > - for (i = 2; i > 0; i--)
> > + for (i = IIC_LAST_BYTE_POS; i > 0; i--)
> > stm32f4_i2c_read_msg(i2c_dev);
> >
> > reg = i2c_dev->base + STM32F4_I2C_CR2;
> > @@ -463,7 +469,7 @@ static void stm32f4_i2c_handle_rx_done(struct stm32f4_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
> >
> > complete(&i2c_dev->complete);
> > break;
> > - case 3:
> > + case (IIC_LAST_BYTE_POS+1):
> > /*
> > * In order to correctly generate the NACK pulse after the last
> > * received data byte, we have to enable NACK before reading N-2
> >
>
> I tested this patch on STM32F429-Disco, it fixes the issue described by Dillon.
> But i think it's not a good idea to make usage of #if !defined(CONFIG_MMU) && !defined(CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL)
> inside the driver code.
Hi Patrice,
Thanks for your time.
How about introducing a dts node for this purpose.
like
stm32-i2c,last-byte-pos = <1>;
or
stm32-i2c,last-byte-pos = <2>;
if not set, the default value is 2
Best Regards
Dillon
>
> Pierre-Yves, Alain, as i am not I2C expert, can you have a look at this patch and propose another solution
> to fix the original issue described by Dillon ?
>
> Thanks
> Patrice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists