linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] iommu/amd: Do not sync on page size changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 1 Jun 2021 18:27:29 +0100
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Jiajun Cao <caojiajun@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] iommu/amd: Do not sync on page size changes

On 2021-06-01 17:39, Nadav Amit wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Jun 1, 2021, at 8:59 AM, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2021-05-02 07:59, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
>>> Some IOMMU architectures perform invalidations regardless of the page
>>> size. In such architectures there is no need to sync when the page size
>>> changes or to regard pgsize when making interim flush in
>>> iommu_iotlb_gather_add_page().
>>> Add a "ignore_gather_pgsize" property for each IOMMU-ops to decide
>>> whether gather's pgsize is tracked and triggers a flush.
>>
>> I've objected before[1], and I'll readily object again ;)
>>
>> I still think it's very silly to add a bunch of indirection all over the place to make a helper function not do the main thing it's intended to help with. If you only need trivial address gathering then it's far simpler to just implement trivial address gathering. I suppose if you really want to you could factor out another helper to share the 5 lines of code which ended up in mtk-iommu (see commit f21ae3b10084).
> 
> Thanks, Robin.
> 
> I read your comments but I cannot fully understand the alternative that you propose, although I do understand your objection to the indirection “ignore_gather_pgsize”. Would it be ok if “ignore_gather_pgsize" was provided as an argument for iommu_iotlb_gather_add_page()?

No, I mean if iommu_iotlb_gather_add_page() doesn't have the behaviour 
your driver wants, just don't call it. Write or factor out a suitable 
helper that *does* do what you want and call that, or just implement the 
logic directly inline. Indirect argument or not, it just doesn't make 
much sense to have a helper function call which says "do this except 
don't do most of it".

> In general, I can live without this patch. It probably would have negligent impact on performance anyhow.

As I implied, it sounds like your needs are the same as the Mediatek 
driver had, so you could readily factor out a new page-size-agnostic 
gather helper from that. I fully support making the functional change to 
amd-iommu *somehow* - nobody likes unnecessary syncs - just not with 
this particular implementation :)

Robin.