lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAhSdy0jN1urNFu_mqqg2jbqzsfztQUJN62oB9dhDTH=RgLR-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:36:59 +0530
From:   Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Sandeep Tripathy <milun.tripathy@...il.com>,
        Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
        Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@....com>,
        Liush <liush@...winnertech.com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/8] cpuidle: Factor-out power domain related code from
 PSCI domain driver

On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 6:47 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 at 13:24, Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com> wrote:
> >
> > The generic power domain related code in PSCI domain driver is largely
> > independent of PSCI and can be shared with RISC-V SBI domain driver
> > hence we factor-out this code into dt_idle_genpd.c and dt_idle_genpd.h.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
>
> A small nitpick below.
>
> [...]
>
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dt_idle_pd_free);
>
> Do we really need to export this symbol? Looks like there are only
> built-in cpuidle drivers that are going to use it. At least for now.
>
> As a matter of fact, the same comment applies to all cases of
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL from $subject patch. Can we drop all of them?

I had kept the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() to be in-sync with the
dt_idle_states.c but in this case I agree we don't need to export.

I will drop all EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL() in the next patch revision.

Regards,
Anup

>
> [...]
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ