linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: phy: realtek: add dt property to disable CLKOUT clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DB8PR04MB679560988832E69559F467F0E63D9@DB8PR04MB6795.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Jun 2021 02:23:48 +0000
From:   Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "hkallweit1@...il.com" <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        "linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: phy: realtek: add dt property to
 disable CLKOUT clock


Hi Andrew,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Sent: 2021年6月2日 6:08
> To: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org; robh+dt@...nel.org;
> hkallweit1@...il.com; linux@...linux.org.uk; f.fainelli@...il.com;
> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>; netdev@...r.kernel.org;
> devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: phy: realtek: add dt property to disable
> CLKOUT clock
> 
> > +struct rtl821x_priv {
> > +	u32 quirks;
> 
> I'm not sure quirks is the correct word here. I would probably use features, or
> flags.

Ok, I will change to flags.

As Russell king suggests another solution, which would you prefer to?
I need a conclusion so that I can send out the V2, thanks.

Best Regards,
Joakim Zhang
> 	  Andrew