[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wnrcqfap.fsf@disp2133>
Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 13:42:22 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Jiashuo Liang <liangjs@....edu.cn>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal/x86: Don't send SIGSEGV twice on SEGV_PKUERR
Jiashuo Liang <liangjs@....edu.cn> writes:
> Before this patch, the __bad_area_nosemaphore function calls both
> force_sig_pkuerr and force_sig_fault when handling SEGV_PKUERR. This does
> not cause problems because the second signal is filtered by the
> legacy_queue check in __send_signal. But it causes the kernel to do
> unnecessary work.
>
> This patch should fix it.
Have you been able to test this patch?
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Does one of the x86 maintainers want to pick up this trivial fix or
should I pick it up?
Eric
> Fixes: 9db812dbb29d ("signal/x86: Call force_sig_pkuerr from __bad_area_nosemaphore")
> Suggested-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiashuo Liang <liangjs@....edu.cn>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> index 1c548ad00752..6bda7f67d737 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> @@ -836,8 +836,8 @@ __bad_area_nosemaphore(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
>
> if (si_code == SEGV_PKUERR)
> force_sig_pkuerr((void __user *)address, pkey);
> -
> - force_sig_fault(SIGSEGV, si_code, (void __user *)address);
> + else
> + force_sig_fault(SIGSEGV, si_code, (void __user *)address);
>
> local_irq_disable();
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists