[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e0f8202-4acc-5092-33c1-82d268b3fd5b@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 21:10:05 +0200
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, valentin.schneider@....com,
corbet@....net, rdunlap@...radead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection
On 27/05/2021 17:38, Beata Michalska wrote:
[...]
> Beata Michalska (3):
> sched/core: Introduce SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY_FULL sched_domain flag
> sched/topology: Rework CPU capacity asymmetry detection
> sched/doc: Update the CPU capacity asymmetry bits
>
> Documentation/scheduler/sched-capacity.rst | 6 +-
> Documentation/scheduler/sched-energy.rst | 2 +-
> include/linux/sched/sd_flags.h | 10 ++
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 194 +++++++++++++--------
> 4 files changed, 133 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
Looks good to me, even though I would like to see a more compact version
of asym_cpu_capacity_classify(). Details in my response to [PATCH v6 2/3].
Did some level of testing myself and wasn't able to break it.
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists