[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87im2vj4ev.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Date: 03 Jun 2021 07:19:20 +0900
From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] ASoC: rsnd: check for zero node count
Hi
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> >
> > The call to rsnd_node_count can potentially return a zero node count
> > so add a check for this corner case. (Note that the two other calls
> > to rsnd_node_count in the kernel perform this check, so I think it
> > justifies adding this). This avoids using a zero nr in a devm_kcalloc
> > call.
>
> I don't have a problem with the patch, but really the code works fine
> as is. A better commit message is:
>
> Most callers of_get_child_count() check that "nr" is non-zero so it
> causes a static checker warning when we don't do that here. This
> doesn't cause a problem or a crash, but having zero SSUIes (What's
> plural of ssui?) doesn't make sense either so let's add a check.
For the code
Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Thank you for your help !!
Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto
Powered by blists - more mailing lists