lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 2 Jun 2021 18:00:54 -0500
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     syzbot <syzbot+84fe685c02cd112a2ac3@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc:     ak@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
        inglorion@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds Read in profile_pc

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 12:15:23AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> syzbot found the following issue on:
> 
> HEAD commit:    7ac3a1c1 Merge tag 'mtd/fixes-for-5.13-rc4' of git://git.k..
> git tree:       upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1246d43dd00000
> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=f9f3fc7daa178986
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=84fe685c02cd112a2ac3
> compiler:       Debian clang version 11.0.1-2
> 
> Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.
> 
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+84fe685c02cd112a2ac3@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> 
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in profile_pc+0xa4/0xe0 arch/x86/kernel/time.c:42
> Read of size 8 at addr ffffc90001c0f7a0 by task systemd-udevd/12323

This looks like a valid bug in profile_pc().  With !FRAME_POINTER, it
has an ancient (2006) hack for unwinding a single frame, for when
regs->ip is in a lock function.

I guess the point is to put lock functions' callees in the profile,
rather than the lock functions themselves.

profile_pc() assumes the return address is either directly at regs->sp,
or one word adjacent to it due to saved flags, both of which are just
completely wrong.  This code has probably never worked with ORC, and
nobody noticed apparently.

We could just use ORC to unwind to the next frame.  Though, isn't
/proc/profile redundant, compared to all the more sophisticated options
nowadays?  Is there still a distinct use case for it or can we just
remove it?

-- 
Josh

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ