| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2920ae60-0064-a972-94fd-57b0caa0c01d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 08:41:43 +0200
From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@...il.com>
To: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, xinhui pan <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Maling list - DRI developers
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] drm/radeon/radeon_pm: use DEVICE_ATTR_RW macro
Am 02.06.21 um 03:53 schrieb Alex Deucher:
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 3:18 AM YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com> wrote:
>> Use DEVICE_ATTR_RW() helper instead of plain DEVICE_ATTR(),
>> which makes the code a bit shorter and easier to read.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> I'm not convinced this really buys us anything other than code churn,
> but I don't have a particularly strong opinion of others feel
> differently.
I agree, especially dropping the amdgpu/radeon prefix from the functions
doesn't sound like something we want.
Christian.
>
> Alex
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c | 56 ++++++++++++------------------
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c
>> index 3861c0b98fcf..edf10cc3947e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_pm.c
>> @@ -352,9 +352,8 @@ static void radeon_pm_print_states(struct radeon_device *rdev)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t radeon_get_pm_profile(struct device *dev,
>> - struct device_attribute *attr,
>> - char *buf)
>> +static ssize_t power_profile_show(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> {
>> struct drm_device *ddev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> struct radeon_device *rdev = ddev->dev_private;
>> @@ -366,10 +365,8 @@ static ssize_t radeon_get_pm_profile(struct device *dev,
>> (cp == PM_PROFILE_HIGH) ? "high" : "default");
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t radeon_set_pm_profile(struct device *dev,
>> - struct device_attribute *attr,
>> - const char *buf,
>> - size_t count)
>> +static ssize_t power_profile_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> {
>> struct drm_device *ddev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> struct radeon_device *rdev = ddev->dev_private;
>> @@ -406,9 +403,8 @@ static ssize_t radeon_set_pm_profile(struct device *dev,
>> return count;
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t radeon_get_pm_method(struct device *dev,
>> - struct device_attribute *attr,
>> - char *buf)
>> +static ssize_t power_method_show(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> {
>> struct drm_device *ddev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> struct radeon_device *rdev = ddev->dev_private;
>> @@ -418,10 +414,9 @@ static ssize_t radeon_get_pm_method(struct device *dev,
>> (pm == PM_METHOD_PROFILE) ? "profile" : "dpm");
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t radeon_set_pm_method(struct device *dev,
>> - struct device_attribute *attr,
>> - const char *buf,
>> - size_t count)
>> +static ssize_t power_method_store(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> {
>> struct drm_device *ddev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> struct radeon_device *rdev = ddev->dev_private;
>> @@ -462,9 +457,8 @@ static ssize_t radeon_set_pm_method(struct device *dev,
>> return count;
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t radeon_get_dpm_state(struct device *dev,
>> - struct device_attribute *attr,
>> - char *buf)
>> +static ssize_t power_dpm_state_show(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>> {
>> struct drm_device *ddev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> struct radeon_device *rdev = ddev->dev_private;
>> @@ -475,10 +469,9 @@ static ssize_t radeon_get_dpm_state(struct device *dev,
>> (pm == POWER_STATE_TYPE_BALANCED) ? "balanced" : "performance");
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t radeon_set_dpm_state(struct device *dev,
>> - struct device_attribute *attr,
>> - const char *buf,
>> - size_t count)
>> +static ssize_t power_dpm_state_store(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> {
>> struct drm_device *ddev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> struct radeon_device *rdev = ddev->dev_private;
>> @@ -506,9 +499,9 @@ static ssize_t radeon_set_dpm_state(struct device *dev,
>> return count;
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t radeon_get_dpm_forced_performance_level(struct device *dev,
>> - struct device_attribute *attr,
>> - char *buf)
>> +static ssize_t power_dpm_force_performance_level_show(struct device *dev,
>> + struct device_attribute *attr,
>> + char *buf)
>> {
>> struct drm_device *ddev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> struct radeon_device *rdev = ddev->dev_private;
>> @@ -523,10 +516,9 @@ static ssize_t radeon_get_dpm_forced_performance_level(struct device *dev,
>> (level == RADEON_DPM_FORCED_LEVEL_LOW) ? "low" : "high");
>> }
>>
>> -static ssize_t radeon_set_dpm_forced_performance_level(struct device *dev,
>> +static ssize_t power_dpm_force_performance_level_store(struct device *dev,
>> struct device_attribute *attr,
>> - const char *buf,
>> - size_t count)
>> + const char *buf, size_t count)
>> {
>> struct drm_device *ddev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>> struct radeon_device *rdev = ddev->dev_private;
>> @@ -658,12 +650,10 @@ static ssize_t radeon_hwmon_get_pwm1(struct device *dev,
>> return sprintf(buf, "%i\n", speed);
>> }
>>
>> -static DEVICE_ATTR(power_profile, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, radeon_get_pm_profile, radeon_set_pm_profile);
>> -static DEVICE_ATTR(power_method, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, radeon_get_pm_method, radeon_set_pm_method);
>> -static DEVICE_ATTR(power_dpm_state, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, radeon_get_dpm_state, radeon_set_dpm_state);
>> -static DEVICE_ATTR(power_dpm_force_performance_level, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
>> - radeon_get_dpm_forced_performance_level,
>> - radeon_set_dpm_forced_performance_level);
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(power_profile);
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(power_method);
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(power_dpm_state);
>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(power_dpm_force_performance_level);
>>
>> static ssize_t radeon_hwmon_show_temp(struct device *dev,
>> struct device_attribute *attr,
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists