linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Add support for MSM8226 RPM clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <162261964337.4130789.14816345669886604238@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Wed, 02 Jun 2021 00:40:43 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bartosz Dudziak <bartosz.dudziak@...jp.pl>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Kathiravan T <kathirav@...eaurora.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Bartosz Dudziak <bartosz.dudziak@...jp.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Add support for MSM8226 RPM clocks

Quoting Bartosz Dudziak (2021-05-02 05:20:27)
> Add rmp smd clocks, PMIC and bus clocks which are required on MSM8226
> for clients to vote on.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Dudziak <bartosz.dudziak@...jp.pl>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> index 0e1dfa8948..bf73942e86 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-smd-rpm.c
> @@ -406,6 +406,79 @@ static const struct clk_ops clk_smd_rpm_branch_ops = {
>         .unprepare      = clk_smd_rpm_unprepare,
>  };
>  
> +/* msm8226 */

This doesn't apply anymore. Can you resend just this one patch please?
And base it on clk-next which I will push out shortly. Ideally a bunch
of clks can be reused instead of redefined.

> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8226, pnoc_clk, pnoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 0);
> +DEFINE_CLK_SMD_RPM(msm8226, snoc_clk, snoc_a_clk, QCOM_SMD_RPM_BUS_CLK, 1);