linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: marvell: Minor documentation correction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFqt6zbX0bOgqcp_575p4T+qTcycS2AhEmrAkZ7+hXrC-K4QfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 2 Jun 2021 13:52:25 +0530
From:   Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        vigneshr@...com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: rawnand: marvell: Minor documentation correction

On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 9:52 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On 4/25/21 2:08 AM, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> > Kernel test robot throws below warning ->
> > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c:454: warning: This comment starts
> > with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer
> > Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
> >
> > Minor documentation correction.
> >
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>
> > Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c
> > index 79da6b0..e7b48d4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/marvell_nand.c
> > @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ struct marvell_nfc_timings {
> >  };
> >
> >  /**
> > - * Derives a duration in numbers of clock cycles.
> > + * TO_CYCLES*() - Derives a duration in numbers of clock cycles.
>
> Hi--
>
> Did you test that?  I would be surprised if kernel-doc stays quiet
> with that change.

Sorry, I missed this thread. yes it's wrong.
Reason -> I posted the wrong patch.
I will correct it in v2.

>
> [testing]
>
> Yep, kernel-doc doesn't like to see that '*' there.
> That doesn't work.
>
> >   *
> >   * @ps: Duration in pico-seconds
> >   * @period_ns:  Clock period in nano-seconds
> >
>
>
> --
> ~Randy
>