[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YLdfbJBk20HIjfDE@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 12:37:32 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Richard Narron <richard@...zen.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/alternative: Optimize single-byte NOPs at an
arbitrary position
On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 10:14:58AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Who again insisted that wouldn't happen? :-)
Yours truly, ofc. :-P
> That's almost a proper comment, might as well finish it
>
> /*
> * optimize_nops_range() - Optimize a sequence of single byte NOPs (0x90)
> * @instr: instruction byte stream
> * @instrlen: length of the above
> * @off: offset within @instr where the first NOP has been detected
> *
> * Return: number of NOPs found (and replaced)
> */
Done.
> for (; i < instrlen && instr[i] == 0x90; i++)
> ;
>
> perhaps? (possibly too dense, up to you)
Yeah, let's leave it simple so that one can read it at a quick glance.
> > +
> > + nnops = i - off;
> > +
> > + if (nnops <= 1)
> > + return nnops;
>
> !nnops would be an error, no?
Yeah, just being overly cautious. It should not be 0 since we're being
called for the byte at offset being 0x90. But I have said "should not
be" before and have fallen flat on my face.
> We really needs that extra line?
Zapped.
> Anyway, irrespective of nits:
>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Thanks, all except one incorporated.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists