linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nfc: mrvl: remove useless "continue" at end of loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Jun 2021 13:10:16 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-nfc@...ts.01.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfc: mrvl: remove useless "continue" at end of loop

On 01/06/2021 18:30, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 18:07 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The "continue" statement at the end of a for loop does not have an
>> effect.
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/usb.c b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/usb.c
> []
>> @@ -325,7 +325,6 @@ static int nfcmrvl_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>>  		if (!drv_data->bulk_rx_ep &&
>>  		    usb_endpoint_is_bulk_in(ep_desc)) {
>>  			drv_data->bulk_rx_ep = ep_desc;
>> -			continue;
>>  		}
>>  	}
> 
> I think this code would be clearer with an if/else instead of
> multiple continues.

Makes sense. I'll send a v2.


Best regards,
Krzysztof